Monday, 06th July, 2020
Choose Language:

Latest
Tribunal
Barrister Razzak said, during hearing of the case of Saidy: It’s a first fully false statement in the civilization which is not stage in the world.
Friday, 30 November 2012
Bangladesh Supreme Court senior lawyer, main defense counselor Barrister Abdur Razzak said, Mawlana Saidys litigation is a fully false statement. Which is a first stage in the world history of civilization against world prominent Muffacir Quran Mawlana Daalawar Hossain Saidy. He said that the law currently running the trial judge act. In 1973, this law was only trial for 195 Pakistani army officers. This law is not justice in a civilian person. The current government was completed in 2009 of the 1973 Act was amended by a team that is zero for leadership and also break fundamental rights contrary to the constitution. Barrister Razzak said his arguments of law point about saidy’s litigation in the International Criminal Tribunal-1 on last Monday. Which consist of Justice Nizamul Houque, Justice Jahangir Hossain and Justice Anwarul Haque in the international crimes tribunal and also presented arguments. In the meantime sick Saidy was spent his time in the dock by study Holly Quran and take rest. Also present here Barrister Tanvir Ahmed Al Amin, Shisir Mohammad Monir and Abu Bakar Siddique. On the other hand advocate Mizanul Islam presented 7 arguments factor within 20 charges. Barrister Razzak presented of Law
point’s argument. These arguments will continue today. These arguments will next week. Barrister Abdur Razzak said in yesterday\\\'s hearing, against the Maulana Saidy’s litigation is false. Those 20 allegations
have been brought to a false and dishonest. Awami League was in power from 1971 until ’75 August and also was in power 1996-2001 after liberation war. But they did not judge. These two cases were not mention. These cannot be trusted. If Saidy was involve with these crimes then must be mention. There are 300 hundred or above litigations were filled but Saidy’s name was not indicated. This two cases is that the entire political. The main purpose of the trial, the defendant’s partners with the Tribunal member Abdur Razzak of Justice Anwarul Haque presented a apaharana recent events (pollen) are showcases of the original get corrupted. They are partners. The main dense party was found. Now if
you could not find the original defense partners cannot be justice?
Barrister Abdur Razzak said the defendant was arrested 195 people in Pakistan. They were detained. They are identified. The list is not mention. The trial will be for the law. Then the three of them leave
the country without trial. Now, 40 years after trial partners in the initiative. I just cannot do justice partners. It has taken the initiative to complete the trial politically motivated.