The allegation submitted against Kamaruzzaman is not specific and it has no consistency: The hearing of the prosecution has been completed and defence argument will be presented on May, 13
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
The prosecution has completed the hearing on the framing of charge against Kamaruzzaman and the defence will start their argument on May 13. There is a lot of inconsistency in the submission of the prosecution even they said as to the firing of the house of Samad by kamaruzzamna but they could not submit whether such advocate Samad is dead or alive. On the other hand, they submitted many allegations where they could not submit any substantiation of those allegation and they tried to avoid this matter only saying that it is printing mistake.
Tribunal questioned why the accusation was not specific and where, how, what and against whom Kamaruzzaman had committed such offences. The matter is that they could not give proper substantiation as to these crimes. The prosecution said, “They have enough evidence which any specific evidence of such crime. In the case of accusation of rape, the prosecution said, “because of the public shame we did not mention the name of such raped women but we have the list of these women”.